generated from john/python-template
320 lines
9.0 KiB
Markdown
320 lines
9.0 KiB
Markdown
# Version 1 Implementation Plan
|
||
|
||
This plan defines the path from MVP to **Version 1 complete**.
|
||
The objective is to deliver the full scoped product with production readiness, while explicitly separating refinements/enhancements into a future document.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 0) Plan Governance & Scope Control (Foundation)
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Keep execution focused on V1 completion, not optimization/perfection.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Create and maintain a **V1 Traceability Matrix**:
|
||
- Requirement ID
|
||
- Current status (`done`, `partial`, `not started`)
|
||
- Owner
|
||
- Validation method
|
||
2. Define V1 completion gates:
|
||
- Functional complete
|
||
- Operationally complete
|
||
- Production-ready complete
|
||
3. Snapshot the MVP baseline (tag/changelog reference).
|
||
4. Create a standing rule: any non-V1 idea is logged to a separate enhancements backlog document (to be named later), not added to active V1 scope unless explicitly approved.
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- `docs/ver1/ver1.md` (this plan)
|
||
- V1 traceability artifact (linked from here when created)
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- Every in-scope requirement has explicit ownership and status.
|
||
- Scope-change process is agreed and followed.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 1) Architecture Consolidation
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Align implementation with the intended architecture and reduce MVP shortcuts.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Compare implemented modules/components with architecture documentation.
|
||
2. Identify and classify architectural debt:
|
||
- Temporary coupling
|
||
- Missing interfaces
|
||
- Placeholder services/components
|
||
3. Resolve high-risk architectural gaps first.
|
||
4. Record key decisions and tradeoffs in ADRs.
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- Updated architecture diagrams and boundaries
|
||
- ADR entries for major decisions
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- Architecture documentation reflects system reality.
|
||
- Critical architecture risks are addressed or scheduled with owners/dates.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 2) Error Handling & Reliability Hardening
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Ensure predictable, safe behavior under failure conditions.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Standardize error taxonomy and envelope format across all layers.
|
||
2. Ensure clear distinction between:
|
||
- User-facing errors
|
||
- Internal/system errors
|
||
- Retryable vs non-retryable failures
|
||
3. Add resilience controls where needed:
|
||
- Timeouts
|
||
- Retries with backoff
|
||
- Circuit breaking / fallback logic
|
||
4. Add failure-path tests for critical workflows.
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- Error code catalog/reference
|
||
- Failure mode test coverage for critical paths
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- Error behavior is consistent across major flows.
|
||
- Known failure scenarios are tested and pass.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 3) Functional Completion by Requirement Domain
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Complete all V1 functional requirements in a risk-aware order.
|
||
|
||
### Recommended Order
|
||
1. Business-critical end-user flows
|
||
2. Data integrity and consistency capabilities
|
||
3. Admin/operational controls
|
||
4. Lower-priority UX and quality-of-life items that are in V1 scope
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
For each requirement slice:
|
||
1. Finalize contract/schema
|
||
2. Implement domain logic
|
||
3. Implement persistence/state changes
|
||
4. Integrate API/UI
|
||
5. Add automated tests
|
||
6. Update docs
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- Requirement completion report with validation evidence
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- All V1 “must-have” requirements are complete and validated.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 4) Data Model, Migration, and Backfill Safety
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Ensure data model and migrations are production-safe.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Validate schema against final V1 domain needs.
|
||
2. Implement forward-safe migrations.
|
||
3. Define rollback/mitigation plans for migration failures.
|
||
4. Build and verify backfill scripts (if needed).
|
||
5. Add migration rehearsal in staging with representative data.
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- Migration runbook
|
||
- Backfill verification checklist
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- Migration plan validated in staging.
|
||
- No unresolved data-loss risk for V1 rollout.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 5) Security, Access Control, and Compliance Baseline
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Close MVP security gaps and establish V1 baseline controls.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Complete authn/authz coverage for all routes/actions.
|
||
2. Enforce input validation and output sanitization.
|
||
3. Verify secret management and credential rotation process.
|
||
4. Add audit logging for sensitive operations.
|
||
5. Run dependency/security scanning in CI and remediate findings.
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- Security checklist with status
|
||
- Threat/risk update for V1 scope
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- No unresolved critical/high vulnerabilities for V1 launch.
|
||
- Access control behavior verified by tests.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6) Observability & Operability
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Make system behavior observable and supportable in production.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Standardize structured logging and correlation IDs.
|
||
2. Add core metrics:
|
||
- Latency
|
||
- Throughput
|
||
- Error rates
|
||
- Resource saturation
|
||
3. Add tracing for critical request/workflow paths.
|
||
4. Define SLOs/SLIs and alert thresholds.
|
||
5. Prepare incident response and rollback runbooks.
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- Dashboards and alerts
|
||
- Operations runbooks
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- Team can detect, triage, and remediate incidents quickly.
|
||
- Core production signals are available and reliable.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 7) Test Strategy Expansion & Quality Gates
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Raise confidence for repeatable, low-risk releases.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Expand unit and integration tests across V1 features.
|
||
2. Add contract tests between key components/services.
|
||
3. Add end-to-end tests for critical user journeys.
|
||
4. Add non-functional tests where relevant:
|
||
- Performance/load
|
||
- Soak
|
||
- Failure-injection scenarios
|
||
5. Enforce CI quality gates (tests, lint, type checks, security scans).
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- Test matrix with ownership
|
||
- CI gate definition and thresholds
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- Critical-path regressions are blocked automatically.
|
||
- Test coverage and reliability thresholds meet V1 targets.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 8) Performance & Scalability Validation
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Meet expected V1 performance at projected load.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Define performance budgets per key flow.
|
||
2. Benchmark current behavior in staging.
|
||
3. Optimize bottlenecks (queries, caching, concurrency, etc.).
|
||
4. Re-test after each optimization and compare against budget.
|
||
5. Document known limits and safe operating bounds.
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- Performance benchmark report
|
||
- Optimization log
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- V1 performance targets met for expected usage profile.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 9) Release Engineering & Environment Readiness
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Make deployment repeatable, controlled, and reversible.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Harden CI/CD pipeline with clear promotion gates.
|
||
2. Ensure config parity and consistency across environments.
|
||
3. Define rollout strategy (phased/canary/limited release as applicable).
|
||
4. Validate rollback procedures in staging.
|
||
5. Produce release checklist and ownership model.
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- Release playbook
|
||
- Environment readiness checklist
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- Deployment and rollback are rehearsed and reliable.
|
||
- Release process is executable without tribal knowledge.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10) Documentation Completion
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Ensure V1 can be built, operated, and supported from documentation.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Update core project docs to match final V1 behavior:
|
||
- Architecture
|
||
- Error handling
|
||
- Requirements status
|
||
- Index/navigation
|
||
- Intent alignment summary
|
||
2. Add operator troubleshooting guides.
|
||
3. Add integration/API examples for consumers.
|
||
4. Publish changelog/version notes for V1.
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- Updated documentation set for V1
|
||
- V1 release notes
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- A new team member can run/support the system using docs alone.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11) Final Validation, UAT, and Launch
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Confirm readiness and launch V1 safely.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Run full-system acceptance validation against the V1 traceability matrix.
|
||
2. Conduct stakeholder UAT and capture sign-off.
|
||
3. Execute production readiness review.
|
||
4. Launch in controlled phases and monitor key signals.
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- UAT/PRR sign-off records
|
||
- Launch checklist and monitoring plan
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- Stakeholder approval achieved.
|
||
- Launch metrics are stable within defined thresholds.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 12) Post-Launch Stabilization (30–60 Days)
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Consolidate V1 in production before major expansion.
|
||
|
||
### Implementation Steps
|
||
1. Track incidents, defects, and user feedback.
|
||
2. Prioritize stabilization fixes with short cycle times.
|
||
3. Remove temporary flags/mitigations introduced during launch.
|
||
4. Produce post-launch retrospective and handoff to standard roadmap cadence.
|
||
|
||
### Deliverables
|
||
- Stabilization report
|
||
- Prioritized backlog update
|
||
|
||
### Exit Criteria
|
||
- Incident/error rates converge to steady-state targets.
|
||
- V1 transitions from launch mode to normal operations.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Recommended Execution Rhythm
|
||
|
||
- **Weekly:** Requirement closure + risk review
|
||
- **Biweekly:** Release train with quality gates
|
||
- **Milestone reviews:** After phases 2, 6, 9, and 11
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Scope Discipline Rule (V1 Focus)
|
||
|
||
To preserve delivery focus:
|
||
- V1 execution prioritizes completion of scoped requirements.
|
||
- Refinements/enhancements are captured in a separate future document and backlog.
|
||
- Only explicitly approved scope changes may enter this plan. |