generated from john/python-template
Jim LancasterandCopilot App
f15c9834e4
Quality Gate / gate (push) Failing after 47s
The handoff brief was a work order for phases 2-5. That work is done, so the document now describes a future that already happened and would misdirect anyone who found it. The review report itself had the same problem in weaker form: its findings read as open. Adds a status banner marking it closed and retained for reasoning only. The banner also records that two of its recommendations were wrong on contact. The HIGH-03 fix as written would have stripped root-cause data from ExecutionAttempt provenance, and the HIGH-01 fix had to preserve per-page durability the report never mentioned. Leaving that unstated invites someone to 'restore' the report's version later. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <[email protected]>
Review Reports
Dated architecture and code review reports generated by
.github/skills/python-code-reviewer/skill.md.
These files are not canonical authority. Everything in docs/reviews/** is a
point-in-time observation, not a contract. Canonical intent lives in docs/index.md,
docs/architecture.md, docs/requirements.md, docs/schema.md,
docs/error_handling.md, and docs/invariant/**. When a report and a canonical
document disagree, the canonical document wins until it is deliberately updated.
Naming: <YYYY-MM-DD>-code-review.md for review reports, and
<YYYY-MM-DD>-remediation-handoff.md for the implementation plan derived from one.
Current
2026-08-23-code-review.md— full review. 0 critical, 4 high, 5 medium, 11 low. All findings remediated. Retained as a record of the reasoning, not as a list of open work. Note that a few of its recommendations were wrong on contact and were corrected during implementation; the code and the guard tests are authoritative over the report text.