generated from john/python-template
5.5 KiB
5.5 KiB
Ver1 Step 4 Results: Data Model and Migration Safety
Summary
Step 4 implementation status: complete (baseline scope).
This document records completed migration-safety work, validation evidence, and remaining follow-ups for Ver1 Step 4.
Implemented in this step:
- Added explicit migration framework module with revision history tracking.
- Added schema compatibility validation and startup guardrails.
- Added migration runner CLI for list/apply/check operations.
- Added migration tests and Step 4 validation evidence.
- Added Step 4 migration/rollback runbook.
Implemented Changes
1) Schema audit and invariant lock
Implemented read-only compatibility checks in src/transcription/db.py:
validate_schema_compatibility(...)verifies required V1 tables:documentjobtranscripttranscriptrevision
- verifies required
job.retry_countcolumn - returns explicit issue identifiers (non-mutating check)
2) Migration policy/tooling lock
Added explicit migration revision model in src/transcription/migrations.py:
MigrationRevisiondataclass- ordered
MIGRATIONSregistry - migration history table:
schema_migration_history - explicit pending-list and apply operations
3) Forward migration implementation
Implemented two baseline forward migrations:
0001_add_retry_count_to_job0002_create_transcriptrevision_table
Each migration is idempotent and recorded in migration history.
4) Rollback and mitigation runbook
Created docs/ver1/ver1-step4-migration-runbook.md with:
- preconditions
- list/apply/check command sequence
- backup-first procedure
- verification checklist
- rollback/mitigation decision tree
- error classification guidance aligned to
docs/error_handling.md
5) Backfill implementation or explicit no-backfill decision
No backfill required for this baseline Step 4 scope.
Rationale:
- additive migration operations only
- default values and new-table creation do not require historical row rewrites for current V1 invariants
- residual advanced backfill scenarios deferred unless future schema evolution introduces incompatible transforms
Test and Verification Evidence
Added/Updated Tests
tests/test_migrations.py- pending migration discovery
- migration apply + history recording
- idempotent re-apply behavior
tests/test_db.py- compatibility-check behavior on fresh schema
- table expectation updates for
transcriptrevision
tests/test_config.py- migration safety setting defaults
tests/test_app.py- lifespan test compatibility with migration/validation startup hooks
Validation Runs
Run and record outcomes:
uv run pytest --collect-only -q-> passeduv run pytest -m unit -q-> passeduv run pytest -m "not external" -q-> passeduv run pytest -q-> passed
Migration Rehearsal Evidence
Migration rehearsal details (test-based):
- baseline data set used: in-memory SQLite legacy-shaped schema fixture (
jobtable missing Step 4 additions) - forward migration result: pending revisions applied successfully (
0001,0002) - post-migration verification result: schema checks pass and migration history recorded
- rollback/mitigation rehearsal result: runbook defined backup-restore primary rollback class for personal-scale SQLite deployment
Requirement Traceability (Step 4)
| Step 4 Area | REQ Coverage | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schema lifecycle and state persistence safety | REQ-3, REQ-4, REQ-11 | met | src/transcription/migrations.py, tests/test_migrations.py, tests/test_db.py |
| Lifespan/runtime ownership continuity | REQ-7 | met | src/transcription/app.py startup checks + existing lifespan ownership model |
| Explicit non-mutating production startup policy | REQ-10 | met | migration_auto_apply_on_startup=False default + explicit runner workflow + startup validation gate |
| Prompt/data continuity constraints | REQ-12 | met (continued) | no prompt-contract mutation in Step 4 changes |
Operational Artifacts Produced
docs/ver1/ver1-step4.mddocs/ver1/ver1-step4-migration-runbook.mdsrc/transcription/migrations.pysrc/transcription/migration_runner.py- README migration workflow updates
Risks, Exceptions, and Follow-Ups
- This lightweight migration system is appropriate for current personal-scale scope but may require a dedicated framework as schema complexity grows.
- Rollback remains backup-restore primary; reversible down-migration coverage is intentionally limited in this baseline.
- Startup compatibility checks currently fail fast with generic runtime error text and can be further normalized under API/operator error envelopes in later hardening.
Open follow-ups to carry forward:
- Evaluate migration framework escalation criteria in Step 9/10 readiness updates.
- Add optional richer structured migration logging fields if observability scope expands.
Step 4 Exit Assessment
- Schema validation against finalized V1 domain: met
- Forward migration path safety and repeatability: met (baseline scope)
- Rollback/mitigation readiness: met (backup-restore primary path)
- Backfill risk closure: met (no backfill required for current deltas)
- Test and regression safety: met
Step 4 completion status: complete (baseline scope)
Handoff to Step 5
Once Step 4 is marked complete, Step 5 can proceed with:
- verified migration safety baseline
- explicit rollback and recovery procedures
- reduced data-integrity risk entering private-network safety hardening