Preserves the traceability the V4.7 plan depends on ahead of starting
implementation in a fresh session. Documentation only.
The V4.6 review log was maintained in a session-scoped database and cited
by number throughout the V4.6, V4.7, and V4.8 planning documents as
"review log [N]". Those citations were unresolvable outside the session
that produced them. The log is now exported verbatim to
docs/ver4.6/review_log_v4_6.md: 70 entries, of which 8 remain open, each
mapped to its disposition (V4.7 phase, accepted risk, or operator
judgement).
The architecture review report is retained rather than deleted. It is the
canonical registry of the 32 finding IDs cited across six documents, so
removing it would orphan every CRIT/HIGH/MED/LOW reference in the planning
corpus. Instead it now carries a status banner marking it as a pre-V4.6
snapshot, warning that its paths, line numbers, and baseline metrics are
stale, recording that all 32 findings were dispositioned in V4.6 with only
MED-14 and HIGH-06 carrying into V4.7, and noting the two recommendations
later revised on evidence - the cancelled services/artifacts.py extraction
and the assumption that job_source and execution_attempt were
complementary rather than duplicated.
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <[email protected]>
zoltan57andCopilot App