Remove completed remediation handoff and mark the review closed

The handoff brief was a work order for phases 2-5. That work is done, so the document now describes a future that already happened and would misdirect anyone who found it. The review report itself had the same problem in weaker form: its findings read as open. Adds a status banner marking it closed and retained for reasoning only. The banner also records that two of its recommendations were wrong on contact. The HIGH-03 fix as written would have stripped root-cause data from ExecutionAttempt provenance, and the HIGH-01 fix had to preserve per-page durability the report never mentioned. Leaving that unstated invites someone to 'restore' the report's version later. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <[email protected]>
2026-08-23 19:25:39 -05:00
parent 2c59cbd2c7
commit f15c9834e4
3 changed files with 14 additions and 263 deletions
@@ -8,6 +8,16 @@
 **Escalations applied:** `.github/skills/evidence-provenance-auditor/skill.md`, `.github/skills/test-effectiveness-auditor/skill.md`
 **Scope:** 77 Python modules / ~13k LOC under `src/transcription`, 57 test files (377 collected non-external tests), 23 documents under `docs/`, 9 active rule files.

+> **Status: closed.** Every finding below was remediated in the phases following this
+> review. This document is retained as a record of the reasoning, **not** as a list of
+> open work, and it is not canonical authority.
+>
+> Two recommendations were wrong on contact and were corrected during implementation:
+> the HIGH-03 fix as written would have stripped root-cause data from `ExecutionAttempt`
+> provenance, and the HIGH-01 fix needed to preserve per-page durability that the report
+> did not mention. Where this text and the current code or guard tests disagree, the code
+> and tests are correct.
+
 ### Verification commands and outcomes

 | Command | Outcome |