generated from john/python-template
Finalized v4.3 scope
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,14 +1,17 @@
|
||||
# Draft Implementation Plan (Version 4.3)
|
||||
# Implementation Plan (Version 4.3)
|
||||
|
||||
## Goal
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare a safe implementation path for constrained application settings. This plan remains provisional until the V4.3 scope-freeze decisions are resolved.
|
||||
Deliver constrained, installation-local application settings while preserving the completed V4.2 behavioral baseline and historical provenance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Planning Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
- V4, V4.1, and V4.2 remain the behavioral baseline.
|
||||
- Settings must use explicit domain operations rather than direct database, environment-file, or arbitrary filesystem access from UI pages.
|
||||
- Prompt changes must preserve historical Job provenance and use a defined safe-write policy.
|
||||
- Source Page Reordering is excluded.
|
||||
- Database, integration, and UI tests must use confirmed isolated test data and must never modify `data/transcription.db`.
|
||||
- Potentially destructive tests must run only through `tools/run_destructive_tests.py`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Expected Project Impact
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,59 +19,67 @@ Prepare a safe implementation path for constrained application settings. This pl
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Documents service | Expand controlled Document Type maintenance operations. |
|
||||
| People service | Expand controlled Person Role maintenance operations. |
|
||||
| Prompt adapter/service | Add constrained listing, reading, validation, and safe writing of prompt artifacts. |
|
||||
| Prompt adapter/service | Add constrained listing, reading, validation, atomic writing, backup, and explicit recovery of existing prompt artifacts. |
|
||||
| UI composition/navigation | Register Settings routes and navigation without moving persistence into UI code. |
|
||||
| Tests | Add registry lifecycle, prompt safety, and UI workflow coverage. |
|
||||
| Tests | Add isolated registry lifecycle, prompt safety, and UI workflow coverage. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposed Implementation Phases
|
||||
## Implementation Phases
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Resolve Scope-Freeze Decisions
|
||||
### 1. Define Service Contracts
|
||||
|
||||
- Define prompt atomic-write, backup, and recovery policy.
|
||||
- Decide whether prompt creation/deletion is excluded.
|
||||
- Finalize registry ordering requirements.
|
||||
- Remove the Draft designation only after these decisions are reflected in scope and acceptance criteria.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Define Service Contracts
|
||||
|
||||
- Define Document Type maintenance commands for create, relabel, sort, activate, and deactivate.
|
||||
- Define Person Role maintenance commands for create, relabel, activate, and deactivate.
|
||||
- Define a Prompt Store interface for constrained list/read/write behavior.
|
||||
- Define Document Type maintenance commands for create, relabel, sort, activate, deactivate, and delete-if-unreferenced.
|
||||
- Define Person Role maintenance commands for create, relabel, activate, deactivate, and delete-if-unreferenced.
|
||||
- Define a Prompt Store interface for constrained list, read, write, backup-status, and explicit recovery behavior.
|
||||
- Map validation, conflict, not-found, dependency, and filesystem failures to existing `AppError` categories.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Expand Registry Maintenance Services
|
||||
### 2. Expand Registry Maintenance Services
|
||||
|
||||
- Reuse existing Document and People service ownership.
|
||||
- Add explicit write methods rather than passing UI-mutated ORM objects directly where practical.
|
||||
- Normalize and validate new stable codes.
|
||||
- Reject duplicate codes deterministically.
|
||||
- Block deletion or omit deletion entirely; use activation state for lifecycle management.
|
||||
- Permit deletion only after a service-owned reference check proves the entry is unreferenced.
|
||||
- Reject deletion of referenced entries deterministically without partial mutation.
|
||||
- Permit label changes whether or not an entry is referenced.
|
||||
- Preserve inactive entries for historical reads.
|
||||
- Add service tests for create, relabel, activation, deactivation, duplicates, immutable codes, and referenced records.
|
||||
- Maintain existing Document Type sort order.
|
||||
- Order Person Roles deterministically by label and then code without adding a schema field.
|
||||
- Add service tests for create, relabel, activation, deactivation, duplicates, immutable codes, ordering, allowed deletion, and blocked referenced deletion.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Add Constrained Prompt Storage
|
||||
### 3. Add Constrained Prompt Storage
|
||||
|
||||
- Place filesystem access behind a dedicated Prompt Store/service boundary.
|
||||
- Resolve all filenames directly beneath the configured prompt root and reject traversal.
|
||||
- Permit only the agreed markdown extension and reject empty content.
|
||||
- Implement the approved safe-write strategy, including flush/replace behavior and backup/recovery if selected.
|
||||
- Permit only existing files with the agreed Markdown extension and reject empty content.
|
||||
- Exclude prompt creation and deletion.
|
||||
- Write new content to a sibling temporary file, flush and sync it, preserve the active file as the sole previous-version backup, and atomically replace the active file.
|
||||
- Expose explicit backup recovery through the same filename validation and safe-write path; never perform automatic rollback.
|
||||
- Clean up temporary files after failed writes while preserving the active prompt and any valid backup.
|
||||
- Preserve file encoding and provide explicit failures for read-only or unavailable storage.
|
||||
- Do not modify any Job row when prompt defaults change.
|
||||
- Add unit tests for valid reads/writes, traversal, invalid names, empty content, filesystem failures, and unchanged Job provenance.
|
||||
- Add unit tests for valid reads/writes, traversal, invalid names, nonexistent-file creation attempts, empty content, atomic replacement failures, single-backup rotation, explicit recovery, filesystem failures, and unchanged Job provenance.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Build the Settings UI
|
||||
### 4. Build the Settings UI
|
||||
|
||||
- Register a Settings landing page and navigation entry.
|
||||
- Add separate pages or panels for Document Types, Person Roles, and Prompts.
|
||||
- Keep pages responsible for orchestration and notifications only.
|
||||
- Use service callbacks for all mutations.
|
||||
- Explain stable codes, inactive historical entries, and future-only prompt effects in the UI.
|
||||
- Present deletion only for unreferenced registry entries and preserve clear conflict feedback if references appear before submission.
|
||||
- Present prompt backup availability and recovery as an explicit operator action.
|
||||
- Do not render raw environment values or secrets.
|
||||
- Add no settings API routes.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Verification and Rollout
|
||||
### 5. Verification and Rollout
|
||||
|
||||
- Confirm every database, integration, and UI test is configured for an isolated test database before execution.
|
||||
- Never run those tests against live data and never modify or replace `data/transcription.db`.
|
||||
- Invoke potentially destructive tests only through `tools/run_destructive_tests.py`.
|
||||
- Run focused service tests before UI integration tests.
|
||||
- Verify inactive registry behavior in both historical display and create/edit selectors.
|
||||
- Verify referenced entries can be relabeled or deactivated but not deleted.
|
||||
- Verify unreferenced entries can be deleted.
|
||||
- Verify prompt changes are picked up by newly created Jobs while historical Jobs retain frozen content/hash.
|
||||
- Run the relevant regression suite.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -77,27 +88,33 @@ Prepare a safe implementation path for constrained application settings. This pl
|
||||
- Existing registry records remain valid.
|
||||
- Prompt editing changes mutable application files, not database provenance already captured on Jobs.
|
||||
- V4.3 must not require users to recreate existing Sources, Documents, People, roles, or types.
|
||||
- Person Role ordering requires no schema migration.
|
||||
- Registry deletion introduces no cascade behavior; references always block deletion.
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposed Delivery Order
|
||||
## Delivery Order
|
||||
|
||||
1. Freeze the remaining decisions.
|
||||
2. Implement registry maintenance service operations.
|
||||
3. Implement the Prompt Store and safety policy.
|
||||
4. Build Settings pages.
|
||||
5. Run integration and regression verification.
|
||||
1. Implement registry maintenance service operations.
|
||||
2. Implement the Prompt Store and safety policy.
|
||||
3. Build Settings pages.
|
||||
4. Run isolated integration and regression verification.
|
||||
|
||||
## Draft Done Criteria
|
||||
## Done Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- All V4.3 acceptance criteria are testable and satisfied.
|
||||
- Settings mutations cross explicit service or adapter boundaries.
|
||||
- Registry codes cannot be accidentally changed.
|
||||
- Referenced registry entries can be relabeled or deactivated but cannot be deleted.
|
||||
- Unreferenced registry entries can be deleted without cascade behavior.
|
||||
- Prompt writes cannot escape the configured directory or rewrite historical provenance.
|
||||
- Prompt writes are atomic, retain one backup, and support explicit recovery.
|
||||
- No secret or raw environment editor exists.
|
||||
- No settings API surface exists.
|
||||
- V4.1 and V4.2 workflows remain intact.
|
||||
- Verification does not touch live data or `data/transcription.db`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Local References
|
||||
|
||||
- [Draft V4.3 Scope Boundary](scope_boundary_v4_3.md)
|
||||
- [V4.3 Scope Boundary](scope_boundary_v4_3.md)
|
||||
- [V4.2 Implementation Plan](../ver4.2/implementation_plan_v4_2.md)
|
||||
- [V4.1 Implementation Plan](../ver4.1/implementation_plan_v4_1.md)
|
||||
- [V4 Implementation Plan](../ver4/implementation_plan_v4.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user